On 12 Dec 2025, at 1:49 PM, David Woodhouse dwmw2@infradead.org wrote:
On Fri, 2025-12-12 at 08:16 +0000, Khushit Shah wrote:
I thought the earlier discussion preferred kvm_lapic_ignore_suppress_eoi_broadcast(), but I’m not tied to it.
I think some of that earlier discussion was 'informed' by me typing code into my mailer, and managing to type an example whose name implied the exact opposite of what the code actually returned. :)
Got it :), How about kvm_lapic_respect_suppress_eoi_broadcast()? It avoids the double-negative and keeps the semantics clear.