From: Hangbin Liu liuhangbin@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 4d42df46d6372ece4cb4279870b46c2ea7304a47 ]
When do IPv6 tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end, we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication.
v5: No change. v4: No change. v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm. Also split the big patch to small ones for each area. v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu.
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault gnault@redhat.com Acked-by: David Ahern dsahern@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu liuhangbin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/ipv6/sit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/sit.c +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t ipip6_tunnel_xmit(str }
if (tunnel->parms.iph.daddr) - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu);
if (skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) { icmpv6_send(skb, ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG, 0, mtu);