4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Avraham Stern avraham.stern@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 4a6d2e525b43eba5870ea7e360f59aa65de00705 ]
When starting aggregation, the code checks the status of the queue allocated to the aggregation tid, which might not yet be allocated and thus the queue index may be invalid. Fix this by reserving a new queue in case the queue id is invalid.
While at it, clean up some unreachable code (a condition that is already handled earlier) and remove all the non-DQA comments since non-DQA mode is no longer supported.
Fixes: cf961e16620f ("iwlwifi: mvm: support dqa-mode agg on non-shared queue") Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern avraham.stern@intel.com Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho luciano.coelho@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c | 38 +++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c @@ -2436,28 +2436,12 @@ int iwl_mvm_sta_tx_agg_start(struct iwl_
/* * Note the possible cases: - * 1. In DQA mode with an enabled TXQ - TXQ needs to become agg'ed - * 2. Non-DQA mode: the TXQ hasn't yet been enabled, so find a free - * one and mark it as reserved - * 3. In DQA mode, but no traffic yet on this TID: same treatment as in - * non-DQA mode, since the TXQ hasn't yet been allocated - * Don't support case 3 for new TX path as it is not expected to happen - * and aggregation will be offloaded soon anyway + * 1. An enabled TXQ - TXQ needs to become agg'ed + * 2. The TXQ hasn't yet been enabled, so find a free one and mark + * it as reserved */ txq_id = mvmsta->tid_data[tid].txq_id; - if (iwl_mvm_has_new_tx_api(mvm)) { - if (txq_id == IWL_MVM_INVALID_QUEUE) { - ret = -ENXIO; - goto release_locks; - } - } else if (unlikely(mvm->queue_info[txq_id].status == - IWL_MVM_QUEUE_SHARED)) { - ret = -ENXIO; - IWL_DEBUG_TX_QUEUES(mvm, - "Can't start tid %d agg on shared queue!\n", - tid); - goto release_locks; - } else if (mvm->queue_info[txq_id].status != IWL_MVM_QUEUE_READY) { + if (txq_id == IWL_MVM_INVALID_QUEUE) { txq_id = iwl_mvm_find_free_queue(mvm, mvmsta->sta_id, IWL_MVM_DQA_MIN_DATA_QUEUE, IWL_MVM_DQA_MAX_DATA_QUEUE); @@ -2466,16 +2450,16 @@ int iwl_mvm_sta_tx_agg_start(struct iwl_ IWL_ERR(mvm, "Failed to allocate agg queue\n"); goto release_locks; } - /* - * TXQ shouldn't be in inactive mode for non-DQA, so getting - * an inactive queue from iwl_mvm_find_free_queue() is - * certainly a bug - */ - WARN_ON(mvm->queue_info[txq_id].status == - IWL_MVM_QUEUE_INACTIVE);
/* TXQ hasn't yet been enabled, so mark it only as reserved */ mvm->queue_info[txq_id].status = IWL_MVM_QUEUE_RESERVED; + } else if (unlikely(mvm->queue_info[txq_id].status == + IWL_MVM_QUEUE_SHARED)) { + ret = -ENXIO; + IWL_DEBUG_TX_QUEUES(mvm, + "Can't start tid %d agg on shared queue!\n", + tid); + goto release_locks; }
spin_unlock(&mvm->queue_info_lock);