From: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
commit 8a6483ac634acda3f599f50082c652d2d37199c7 upstream.
Link training fails with:
Link training timeout waiting for LT_LOOPDONE! main link enable error: -110
This is caused by too tight timeouts, which were changed recently in aa92213f388b ("drm/bridge: tc358767: Simplify polling in tc_link_training()").
With a quick glance, the commit does not change the timeouts. However, the method of delaying/sleeping is different, and as the timeout in the previous implementation was not explicit, the new version in practice has much tighter timeout.
The same change was made to other parts in the driver, but the link training timeout is the only one I have seen causing issues. Nevertheless, 1 us sleep is not very sane, and the timeouts look pretty tight, so lets fix all the timeouts.
One exception was the aux busy poll, where the poll sleep was much longer than necessary (or optimal).
I measured the times on my setup, and now the sleep times are set to such values that they result in multiple loops, but not too many (say, 5-10 loops). The timeouts were all increased to 100ms, which should be more than enough for all of these, but in case of bad errors, shouldn't stop the driver as multi-second timeouts could do.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkeinen@ti.com Fixes: aa92213f388b ("drm/bridge: tc358767: Simplify polling in tc_link_training()") Tested-by: Andrey Smirnov andrew.smirnov@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong narmstrong@baylibre.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191209082707.24531-1-tomi.va... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static inline int tc_poll_timeout(struct
static int tc_aux_wait_busy(struct tc_data *tc) { - return tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP0_AUXSTATUS, AUX_BUSY, 0, 1000, 100000); + return tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP0_AUXSTATUS, AUX_BUSY, 0, 100, 100000); }
static int tc_aux_write_data(struct tc_data *tc, const void *data, @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static int tc_aux_link_setup(struct tc_d if (ret) goto err;
- ret = tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP_PHY_CTRL, PHY_RDY, PHY_RDY, 1, 1000); + ret = tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP_PHY_CTRL, PHY_RDY, PHY_RDY, 100, 100000); if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) { dev_err(tc->dev, "Timeout waiting for PHY to become ready"); return ret; @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static int tc_wait_link_training(struct int ret;
ret = tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP0_LTSTAT, LT_LOOPDONE, - LT_LOOPDONE, 1, 1000); + LT_LOOPDONE, 500, 100000); if (ret) { dev_err(tc->dev, "Link training timeout waiting for LT_LOOPDONE!\n"); return ret; @@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int tc_main_link_enable(struct tc dp_phy_ctrl &= ~(DP_PHY_RST | PHY_M1_RST | PHY_M0_RST); ret = regmap_write(tc->regmap, DP_PHY_CTRL, dp_phy_ctrl);
- ret = tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP_PHY_CTRL, PHY_RDY, PHY_RDY, 1, 1000); + ret = tc_poll_timeout(tc, DP_PHY_CTRL, PHY_RDY, PHY_RDY, 500, 100000); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "timeout waiting for phy become ready"); return ret;