Hi Greg,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:34:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.235 release. There are 357 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210): mips: 65 configs -> 1 failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> failed xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Note: mips build failed with the error:
arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ')' before '&' token 42 | static DECLARE_TASKLET(pvc_display_tasklet, &pvc_display, 0); | ^~ | ) arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c: In function 'pvc_line_proc_write': arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: error: 'pvc_display_tasklet' undeclared (first use in this function) 87 | tasklet_schedule(&pvc_display_tasklet); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in At top level: arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: 'pvc_display' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 33 | static void pvc_display(unsigned long data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~
s390 build failed with:
drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:658:23: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char)'} from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char, unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 658 | .pe_handler = dasd_diag_pe_handler, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:658:23: note: (near initialization for 'dasd_diag_discipline.pe_handler')
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3081
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk