On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:32 PM Parth Pancholi parth105105@gmail.com wrote:
From: Emanuele Ghidoli emanuele.ghidoli@toradex.com
On a few platforms such as TI's AM69 device, disable_irq() fails to keep track of the interrupts that happen between disable_irq() and enable_irq() and those interrupts are missed. Use the ->irq_unmask() and ->irq_mask() methods instead of ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() to correctly keep track of edges when disable_irq is called. This solves the issue of disable_irq() not working as expected on such platforms.
Fixes: 23265442b02b ("ARM: davinci: irq_data conversion.") Signed-off-by: Emanuele Ghidoli emanuele.ghidoli@toradex.com Signed-off-by: Parth Pancholi parth.pancholi@toradex.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
It looks good to me but I'd like to have an Ack from Keerthy on this.
Bart