The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 21b5ee59ef18e27d85810584caf1f7ddc705ea83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kim Phillips kim.phillips@amd.com Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:52:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu/amd: Enable the fixed Instructions Retired counter IRPERF
Commit
aaf248848db50 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired) performance counter")
added support for access to the free-running counter via 'perf -e msr/irperf/', but when exercised, it always returns a 0 count:
BEFORE:
$ perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true
Performance counter stats for 'true':
624,833 instructions 0 msr/irperf/
Simply set its enable bit - HWCR bit 30 - to make it start counting.
Enablement is restricted to all machines advertising IRPERF capability, except those susceptible to an erratum that makes the IRPERF return bad values.
That erratum occurs in Family 17h models 00-1fh [1], but not in F17h models 20h and above [2].
AFTER (on a family 17h model 31h machine):
$ perf stat -e instructions,msr/irperf/ true
Performance counter stats for 'true':
621,690 instructions 622,490 msr/irperf/
[1] Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 00h-0Fh Processors [2] Revision Guide for AMD Family 17h Models 30h-3Fh Processors
The revision guides are available from the bugzilla Link below.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Fixes: aaf248848db50 ("perf/x86/msr: Add AMD IRPERF (Instructions Retired) performance counter") Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips kim.phillips@amd.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206537 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200214201805.13830-1-kim.phillips@amd.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index ebe1685e92dd..d5e517d1c3dd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -512,6 +512,8 @@ #define MSR_K7_HWCR 0xc0010015 #define MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK_BIT 0 #define MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK BIT_ULL(MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK_BIT) +#define MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN_BIT 30 +#define MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN BIT_ULL(MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN_BIT) #define MSR_K7_FID_VID_CTL 0xc0010041 #define MSR_K7_FID_VID_STATUS 0xc0010042
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index ac83a0fef628..1f875fbe1384 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
static const int amd_erratum_383[]; static const int amd_erratum_400[]; +static const int amd_erratum_1054[]; static bool cpu_has_amd_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu, const int *erratum);
/* @@ -972,6 +973,15 @@ static void init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* AMD CPUs don't reset SS attributes on SYSRET, Xen does. */ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XENPV)) set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS); + + /* + * Turn on the Instructions Retired free counter on machines not + * susceptible to erratum #1054 "Instructions Retired Performance + * Counter May Be Inaccurate". + */ + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IRPERF) && + !cpu_has_amd_erratum(c, amd_erratum_1054)) + msr_set_bit(MSR_K7_HWCR, MSR_K7_HWCR_IRPERF_EN_BIT); }
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 @@ -1099,6 +1109,10 @@ static const int amd_erratum_400[] = static const int amd_erratum_383[] = AMD_OSVW_ERRATUM(3, AMD_MODEL_RANGE(0x10, 0, 0, 0xff, 0xf));
+/* #1054: Instructions Retired Performance Counter May Be Inaccurate */ +static const int amd_erratum_1054[] = + AMD_OSVW_ERRATUM(0, AMD_MODEL_RANGE(0x17, 0, 0, 0x2f, 0xf)); +
static bool cpu_has_amd_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *cpu, const int *erratum) {