From: Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu
commit ca7af0402550f9a0b3316d5f1c30904e42ed257d upstream.
Here we're randomly adding between 0 and 7 random increments to the selected source port in order to add some noise in the source port selection that will make the next port less predictable.
With the default port range of 32768-60999 this means a worst case reuse scenario of 14116/8=1764 connections between two consecutive uses of the same port, with an average of 14116/4.5=3137. This code was stressed at more than 800000 connections per second to a fixed target with all connections closed by the client using RSTs (worst condition) and only 2 connections failed among 13 billion, despite the hash being reseeded every 10 seconds, indicating a perfectly safe situation.
Cc: Moshe Kol moshe.kol@mail.huji.ac.il Cc: Yossi Gilad yossi.gilad@mail.huji.ac.il Cc: Amit Klein aksecurity@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau w@1wt.eu Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c @@ -644,11 +644,12 @@ next_port: return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
ok: - /* If our first attempt found a candidate, skip next candidate - * in 1/16 of cases to add some noise. + /* Here we want to add a little bit of randomness to the next source + * port that will be chosen. We use a max() with a random here so that + * on low contention the randomness is maximal and on high contention + * it may be inexistent. */ - if (!i && !(prandom_u32() % 16)) - i = 2; + i = max_t(int, i, (prandom_u32() & 7) * 2); WRITE_ONCE(table_perturb[index], READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + i + 2);
/* Head lock still held and bh's disabled */