26 Jun
2020
26 Jun
'20
1:17 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:47:41PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Thu 2020-06-25 20:45:16, Mark Brown wrote:
The documentation is an issue (and another thing that probably ought to block stable backports...) but the lack of usage is totally fine, there is zero requirement that DTs be upstream - this is a stable ABI.
I'd expect stable for fixing known bugs, not really for "someone out of tree might be using old kernel with new dts".
I don't think this is suitable for a stable backport, or that we should just stop calling this stable, I'm just pointing out that there is never any requirement for any DT stuff to have in-tree users.