5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Clément Léger cleger@rivosinc.com
[ Upstream commit 17c67ed752d6a456602b3dbb25c5ae4d3de5deab ]
Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger cleger@rivosinc.com Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt palmer@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c index b5d592d4099e8..d975a67673299 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c @@ -158,6 +158,20 @@ static void handle_sigsys(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext)
/* In preparation for sigreturn. */ SYSCALL_DISPATCH_OFF(glob_sel); + + /* + * The tests for argument handling assume that `syscall(x) == x`. This + * is a NOP on x86 because the syscall number is passed in %rax, which + * happens to also be the function ABI return register. Other + * architectures may need to swizzle the arguments around. + */ +#if defined(__riscv) +/* REG_A7 is not defined in libc headers */ +# define REG_A7 (REG_A0 + 7) + + ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A0] = + ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A7]; +#endif }
TEST(dispatch_and_return)