5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com
Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst states that the "nohz_full=" mask must not include the boot CPU, which is no longer true after:
08ae95f4fd3b ("nohz_full: Allow the boot CPU to be nohz_full").
However after:
aae17ebb53cd ("workqueue: Avoid using isolated cpus' timers on queue_delayed_work")
the kernel will crash at boot time in this case; housekeeping_any_cpu() returns an invalid CPU number until smp_init() brings the first housekeeping CPU up.
Change housekeeping_any_cpu() to check the result of cpumask_any_and() and return smp_processor_id() in this case.
This is just the simple and backportable workaround which fixes the symptom, but smp_processor_id() at boot time should be safe at least for type == HK_TYPE_TIMER, this more or less matches the tick_do_timer_boot_cpu logic.
There is no worry about cpu_down(); tick_nohz_cpu_down() will not allow to offline tick_do_timer_cpu (the 1st online housekeeping CPU).
[ Apply only documentation changes as commit which causes boot crash when boot CPU is nohz_full is not backported to stable kernels - Krishanth ]
Reported-by: Chris von Recklinghausen crecklin@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov oleg@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Phil Auld pauld@redhat.com Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker frederic@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240411143905.GA19288@redhat.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240402105847.GA24832@redhat.com/ Signed-off-by: Krishanth Jagaduri Krishanth.Jagaduri@sony.com [ strip out upstream commit and Fixes: so tools don't get confused that this commit actually does anything real - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst +++ b/Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst @@ -129,11 +129,8 @@ adaptive-tick CPUs: At least one non-ad online to handle timekeeping tasks in order to ensure that system calls like gettimeofday() returns accurate values on adaptive-tick CPUs. (This is not an issue for CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y because there are no running -user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.) Therefore, the -boot CPU is prohibited from entering adaptive-ticks mode. Specifying a -"nohz_full=" mask that includes the boot CPU will result in a boot-time -error message, and the boot CPU will be removed from the mask. Note that -this means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for +user processes to observe slight drifts in clock rate.) Note that this +means that your system must have at least two CPUs in order for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y to do anything for you.
Finally, adaptive-ticks CPUs must have their RCU callbacks offloaded.