From: Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com
[ upstream commmit ab1dab960b8352cee082db0f8a54dc92a948bfd7 ]
With IORING_FEAT_FAST_POLL in place, io_put_req_find_next() for poll requests doesn't make much sense, and in any case re-adding it shouldn't be a problem considering batching in tctx_task_work(). We can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/15699682bf81610ec901d4e79d6da64baa9f70be.163960518... Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk [pavel: backport] Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov asml.silence@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/io_uring.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -5460,7 +5460,6 @@ static inline bool io_poll_complete(stru static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_kiocb *req, bool *locked) { struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; - struct io_kiocb *nxt;
if (io_poll_rewait(req, &req->poll)) { spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); @@ -5484,11 +5483,8 @@ static void io_poll_task_func(struct io_ spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock); io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
- if (done) { - nxt = io_put_req_find_next(req); - if (nxt) - io_req_task_submit(nxt, locked); - } + if (done) + io_put_req(req); } }