5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
[ Upstream commit b9080468caeddc58a91edd1c3a7d212ea82b0d1d ]
__symbol_put() is really meant as an internal helper and is not available when module unloading is disabled, unlike the previously used symbol_put():
samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_break_module_exit': samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c:73:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__symbol_put'; did you mean '__symbol_get'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
The hw_break_module_exit() function is not actually used when module unloading is disabled, but it still causes the build failure for an undefined identifier. Enclose this one call in an appropriate #ifdef to clarify what the requirement is. Leaving out the entire exit function would also work but feels less clar in this case.
Fixes: 910e230d5f1bb ("samples/hw_breakpoint: Fix kernel BUG 'invalid opcode: 0000'") Fixes: d8a84d33a4954 ("samples/hw_breakpoint: drop use of kallsyms_lookup_name()") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek pmladek@suse.com Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c b/samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c index 9debd128b2ab8..b99322f188e59 100644 --- a/samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c +++ b/samples/hw_breakpoint/data_breakpoint.c @@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ static int __init hw_break_module_init(void) static void __exit hw_break_module_exit(void) { unregister_wide_hw_breakpoint(sample_hbp); +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD __symbol_put(ksym_name); +#endif printk(KERN_INFO "HW Breakpoint for %s write uninstalled\n", ksym_name); }