From: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 1961d20f6fa8903266ed9bd77c691924c22c8f02 ]
When building the free space tree with the block group tree feature enabled, we can hit an assertion failure like this:
BTRFS info (device loop0 state M): rebuilding free space tree assertion failed: ret == 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6592 Comm: syz-executor322 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-gd7fa1af5b33e #0 PREEMPT Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 lr : populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 sp : ffff8000a4ce7600 x29: ffff8000a4ce76e0 x28: ffff0000c9bc6000 x27: ffff0000ddfff3d8 x26: ffff0000ddfff378 x25: dfff800000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff8000a4ce7660 x22: ffff70001499cecc x21: ffff0000e1d8c160 x20: ffff0000e1cb7800 x19: ffff0000e1d8c0b0 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: ffff800092f39000 x16: ffff80008ad27e48 x15: ffff700011e740c0 x14: 1ffff00011e740c0 x13: 0000000000000004 x12: ffffffffffffffff x11: ffff700011e740c0 x10: 0000000000ff0100 x9 : 94ef24f55d2dbc00 x8 : 94ef24f55d2dbc00 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 0000000000000001 x5 : ffff8000a4ce6f98 x4 : ffff80008f415ba0 x3 : ffff800080548ef0 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000100000000 x0 : 000000000000003e Call trace: populate_free_space_tree+0x514/0x518 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 (P) btrfs_rebuild_free_space_tree+0x14c/0x54c fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1337 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xa78/0xe10 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3074 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1319 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0x828/0x2418 fs/btrfs/super.c:1543 reconfigure_super+0x1d4/0x6f0 fs/super.c:1083 do_remount fs/namespace.c:3365 [inline] path_mount+0xb34/0xde0 fs/namespace.c:4200 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4221 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4432 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4409 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x3e8/0x468 fs/namespace.c:4409 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x17c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:767 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:786 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600 Code: f0047182 91178042 528089c3 9771d47b (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This happens because we are processing an empty block group, which has no extents allocated from it, there are no items for this block group, including the block group item since block group items are stored in a dedicated tree when using the block group tree feature. It also means this is the block group with the highest start offset, so there are no higher keys in the extent root, hence btrfs_search_slot_for_read() returns 1 (no higher key found).
Fix this by asserting 'ret' is 0 only if the block group tree feature is not enabled, in which case we should find a block group item for the block group since it's stored in the extent root and block group item keys are greater than extent item keys (the value for BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY is 192 and for BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY and BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY the values are 168 and 169 respectively). In case 'ret' is 1, we just need to add a record to the free space tree which spans the whole block group, and we can achieve this by making 'ret == 0' as the while loop's condition.
Reported-by: syzbot+36fae25c35159a763a2a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6841dca8.a00a0220.d4325.0020.GAE@google.... Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org ---
**YES**
This commit should be backported to stable kernel trees, specifically to the 6.1.x and 6.6.x stable series. Here's my extensive analysis:
## Bug Severity and Impact
The commit fixes a **kernel BUG/assertion failure** that causes a system crash when rebuilding the free space tree. The stack trace shows:
``` assertion failed: ret == 0, in fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1102! ```
This is a serious issue that results in system instability and affects users who: 1. Use BTRFS with the block group tree feature enabled 2. Trigger a free space tree rebuild (e.g., during remount operations) 3. Have empty block groups in their filesystem
## Technical Analysis of the Fix
The fix is minimal and targeted:
```diff - ASSERT(ret == 0); + if (!btrfs_fs_compat_ro(trans->fs_info, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE)) + ASSERT(ret == 0); ```
and
```diff - while (1) { + while (ret == 0) { ```
The root cause is well-understood: when the block group tree feature is enabled, block group items are stored in a dedicated tree rather than the extent tree. For empty block groups, `btrfs_search_slot_for_read()` correctly returns 1 (no key found), but the old code incorrectly asserted this must be 0.
## Stable Backport Criteria
1. **Fixes a real bug affecting users**: ✓ (kernel crash) 2. **Small and contained fix**: ✓ (2 line logic changes + comments) 3. **No major side effects**: ✓ (only affects the specific error case) 4. **No architectural changes**: ✓ (simple logic adjustment) 5. **Critical subsystem but minimal risk**: ✓ (BTRFS, but very targeted fix)
## Version Considerations
Based on my repository analysis: - The block group tree feature was introduced in kernel 6.1-rc1 - Only 6.1.x and 6.6.x LTS kernels have this feature - Earlier kernels (5.10, 5.15) don't need this fix as they lack the feature
## Similar Commit Patterns
Looking at the provided similar commits: - Commits fixing free space tree corruption/crashes were marked YES for backporting - Only cosmetic or debug-related changes were marked NO - This commit follows the pattern of commits #1 and #2 which fixed actual bugs
## Conclusion
Despite lacking an explicit `Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org` tag, this commit meets all criteria for stable backporting. It fixes a kernel crash with a minimal, well-understood change that only affects systems using a specific BTRFS feature. The fix should be backported to 6.1.x and 6.6.x stable series where the block group tree feature exists.
fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c index 39c6b96a4c25a..31fbf39e6b729 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c @@ -1099,11 +1099,21 @@ static int populate_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(extent_root, &key, path, 1, 0); if (ret < 0) goto out_locked; - ASSERT(ret == 0); + /* + * If ret is 1 (no key found), it means this is an empty block group, + * without any extents allocated from it and there's no block group + * item (key BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) located in the extent tree + * because we are using the block group tree feature, so block group + * items are stored in the block group tree. It also means there are no + * extents allocated for block groups with a start offset beyond this + * block group's end offset (this is the last, highest, block group). + */ + if (!btrfs_fs_compat_ro(trans->fs_info, BLOCK_GROUP_TREE)) + ASSERT(ret == 0);
start = block_group->start; end = block_group->start + block_group->length; - while (1) { + while (ret == 0) { btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
if (key.type == BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY || @@ -1133,8 +1143,6 @@ static int populate_free_space_tree(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, ret = btrfs_next_item(extent_root, path); if (ret < 0) goto out_locked; - if (ret) - break; } if (start < end) { ret = __add_to_free_space_tree(trans, block_group, path2,