5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yu-Chun Lin eleanor15x@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit b899981750dcb958ceffa4462d903963ee494aa2 ]
As reported by the kernel test robot, the following error occurs:
arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c:65:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_report_meminfo' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 65 | void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch_report_meminfo() is declared in include/linux/proc_fs.h and only defined when CONFIG_PROC_FS is enabled. Wrap its definition in #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS to fix the -Wmissing-prototypes warning.
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502082315.IPaHaTyM-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin eleanor15x@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Helge Deller deller@gmx.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c index fcc761b0e11b9..d20e8283c5b8a 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/pdt.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static unsigned long pdt_entry[MAX_PDT_ENTRIES] __page_aligned_bss; #define PDT_ADDR_PERM_ERR (pdt_type != PDT_PDC ? 2UL : 0UL) #define PDT_ADDR_SINGLE_ERR 1UL
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS /* report PDT entries via /proc/meminfo */ void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m) { @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ void arch_report_meminfo(struct seq_file *m) seq_printf(m, "PDT_cur_entries: %7lu\n", pdt_status.pdt_entries); } +#endif
static int get_info_pat_new(void) {