Hi Daniel,
Daniel Mack daniel@zonque.org wrote on Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:43:18 +0200:
Hi Chris,
On 27/9/2018 11:55 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
On 27/09/18 20:56, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:11:45 +0200 Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Mack daniel@zonque.org wrote on Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:17:51 +0200:
At least on PXA3xx platforms, enabling RDY interrupts in the NDCR register will only cause the IRQ to latch when the RDY lanes are changing, and not in case they are already asserted.
This means that if the controller finished the command in flight before marvell_nfc_wait_op() is called, that function will wait for a change in the bit that can't ever happen as it is already set.
To address this race, check for the RDY bits after the IRQ was enabled, and complete the completion immediately if the condition is already met.
This fixes a bug that was observed with a NAND chip that holds a UBIFS parition on which file system stress tests were executed. When marvell_nfc_wait_op() reports an error, UBI/UBIFS will eventually mount the filesystem read-only, reporting lots of warnings along the way.
Fixes: 02f26ecf8c77 mtd: nand: add reworked Marvell NAND controller driver Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack daniel@zonque.org
Sorry I haven't had the time to check on my Armada, but you figured it out, and the fix looks good to me!
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Boris, do you plan to send another fixes PR of can I take it into the nand/next branch?
Queued to mtd/master. After fixing my R/B configuration I get a new error with this patch when
running stress_1 from mtd-utils-2.0.0. I don't see this without the patch.
That's strange. So your controller sets the RDY bits before it is ready? Could you check whether only checking for NDSR_RDY(0) changes anything? Not sure about the handling of NDSR_RDY(1) in this driver anyway ...
I suppose you mean this portion of code is not clear enough?
u32 st = readl_relaxed(nfc->regs + NDSR); u32 ien = (~readl_relaxed(nfc->regs + NDCR)) & NDCR_ALL_INT;
/* * RDY interrupt mask is one bit in NDCR while there are two status * bit in NDSR (RDY[cs0/cs2] and RDY[cs1/cs3]). */ if (st & NDSR_RDY(1)) st |= NDSR_RDY(0);
if (!(st & ien)) return IRQ_NONE;
-> st is the status in the NDSR register which has two RDY bits, one for each RDY line. -> ien is a view of the NDCR register which commands the interrupts and has one bit to enable both interrupt lines (let's call it NDCR_RDYM).
The trick is that NDSR_RDY(0) is the same bit as NDCR_RDYM. So whenever NDSR_RDY(1) is set, we fake NDSR_RDY(0) to be set (by setting manually the bit in 'st') so that the (st & ien) comparison can be true if NDSR_RDY(1) is valid and RDY interrupts are enabled.
With this in mind, I don't see why this
+ st = readl_relaxed(nfc->regs + NDSR); + if (st & (NDSR_RDY(0) | NDSR_RDY(1))) + complete(&nfc->complete);
would break the driver.
Thanks, Miquèl