On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:33:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 02:33:12PM -0600, Tom Saeger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 04:07:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.240 release. There are 104 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Apr 2023 14:03:18 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.240-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hey Greg,
This still reproduces:
cp arch/mips/configs/lasat_defconfig .config make ARCH=mips olddefconfig make ARCH=mips
.../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ')' before '&' token 42 | static DECLARE_TASKLET(pvc_display_tasklet, &pvc_display, 0); | ^~ | ) .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c: In function 'pvc_line_proc_write': .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: error: 'pvc_display_tasklet' undeclared (first use in this function) 87 | tasklet_schedule(&pvc_display_tasklet); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in At top level: .../linux-stable-5.4/arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: 'pvc_display' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 33 | static void pvc_display(unsigned long data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Attached is mbox of fixed-up revert/backports.
Odd that no one else is reporting this. Thanks for the patches, I've queued them up for the next 5.4.y release.
Found it reported most recently here:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/642d5611.630a0220.6455f.2988@mx.google.com/
Thanks taking them!
--Tom