6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Kaplan david.kaplan@amd.com
[ Upstream commit 930f2361fe542a00de9ce6070b1b6edb976f1165 ]
On Intel CPUs, the default retbleed mitigation is IBRS/eIBRS but this requires that a similar spectre_v2 mitigation is applied. If the user selects a different spectre_v2 mitigation (like spectre_v2=retpoline) a warning is printed but sysfs will still report 'Mitigation: IBRS' or 'Mitigation: Enhanced IBRS'. This is incorrect because retbleed is not mitigated, and IBRS is not actually set.
Fix this by choosing RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE in this scenario so the kernel correctly reports the system as vulnerable to retbleed.
Signed-off-by: David Kaplan david.kaplan@amd.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) bp@alien8.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250915134706.3201818-1-david.kaplan@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 315926ccea0fa..f66e0e5b49eb1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -1185,8 +1185,10 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void) retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_EIBRS; break; default: - if (retbleed_mitigation != RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF) + if (retbleed_mitigation != RETBLEED_MITIGATION_STUFF) { pr_err(RETBLEED_INTEL_MSG); + retbleed_mitigation = RETBLEED_MITIGATION_NONE; + } } }