Hi Bartosz,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:04:27 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski brgl@bgdev.pl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:57 PM Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org wrote:
On 2022-09-21 16:54, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org
[ Upstream commit 94e9bc73d85aa6ecfe249e985ff57abe0ab35f34 ]
This turns the IXP4xx GPIO irqchip into an immutable irqchip, a bit different from the standard template due to being hierarchical.
Tested on the IXP4xx which uses drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c for a rootfs on compact flash with IRQs from this GPIO block to the CF ATA controller.
Cc: Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Acked-by: Marc Zyngier maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski brgl@bgdev.pl Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
Why? The required dependencies are only in 5,19, and are definitely NOT a stable candidate...
This isn't a fix by any stretch of the imagination.
Hi Marc,
While I didn't mark it for stable (and it shouldn't go into any branch earlier than 5.19.x), I did send the patches making the irqchips immutable to Linus Torvalds as fixes as they technically do *fix* the warning emitted by gpiolib and make the implementation correct.
I think these patches should still be part of the v5.19.x stable branch.
5.19, sure. All the dependencies are there, and tightening the driver implementations is a valuable goal.
However, targeting all the other stable releases (5.4, 5.10, 5.15) makes little sense. It won't even compile! Do the dependencies need to be backported? I don't think it is worthwhile, as this is a long series containing multiple related changes spread all over the tree. This would defeat the very purpose of a stable tree.
M.