Re: [PATCH 05/21] binder: fix trivial typo of binder_free_buf_locked()

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:08:05AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:

It's a bit confusing that the pair of methods binder_alloc_free_buf and binder_free_buf_locked are inconsistent in whether they user the alloc_ prefix. It might be worth it to change them to be consistent?

Right, the prefix is concistent across the APIs but not really for the local function names. I wouldn't mind adding the "alloc" part, it just seemed easier to fix the comment and backport that.

-- Carlos Llamas