30 Sep
2021
30 Sep
'21
9:16 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:07:09PM +0200, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
On 9/30/21 10:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:04:00PM +0200, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
...
Second, what is the problem with having one write more or less? Your current code doesn't guarantee this either. It only decreases probability of such scenario. Am I wrong?
Indeed my approach just decreases the probability and we sometimes end up writing twice to wakeup the card, but it would kinda bug me if we'd always do one write too much.
Anyway, if you still prefer the read_poll_timeout() solution I'd be alright with that of course.
Yes, it will make code cleaner.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko