From: Hao Luo haoluo@google.com
commit 34d3a78c681e8e7844b43d1a2f4671a04249c821 upstream.
Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging, the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM.
Fixes: 63d9b80dcf2c ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()") Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") Signed-off-by: Hao Luo haoluo@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-8-haoluo@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16.x Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 ++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_per_cpu_ptr, const void * const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_per_cpu_ptr_proto = { .func = bpf_per_cpu_ptr, .gpl_only = false, - .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL, + .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY, .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_this_cpu_ptr, const void const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto = { .func = bpf_this_cpu_ptr, .gpl_only = false, - .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID, + .ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | MEM_RDONLY, .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, };
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4333,15 +4333,30 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_v mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } } - } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MEM) { + } else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_MEM) { + bool rdonly_mem = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type); + + if (type_may_be_null(reg->type)) { + verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno, + reg_type_str(env, reg->type)); + return -EACCES; + } + + if (t == BPF_WRITE && rdonly_mem) { + verbose(env, "R%d cannot write into %s\n", + regno, reg_type_str(env, reg->type)); + return -EACCES; + } + if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 && is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) { verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into mem\n", value_regno); return -EACCES; } + err = check_mem_region_access(env, regno, off, size, reg->mem_size, false); - if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) + if (!err && value_regno >= 0 && (t == BPF_READ || rdonly_mem)) mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) { enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; @@ -6550,6 +6565,13 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_ regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag; regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = tsize; } else { + /* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it + * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise + * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in + * check_mem_access(). + */ + ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY; + regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag; regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf; regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id; @@ -9362,7 +9384,7 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verif
if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID) { dst_reg->type = aux->btf_var.reg_type; - switch (dst_reg->type) { + switch (base_type(dst_reg->type)) { case PTR_TO_MEM: dst_reg->mem_size = aux->btf_var.mem_size; break; @@ -11505,7 +11527,7 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bp err = -EINVAL; goto err_put; } - aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_MEM; + aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY; aux->btf_var.mem_size = tsize; } else { aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;