Hi greg,
On 15-Dec-25 9:12 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
commit eb296c09805ee37dd4ea520a7fb3ec157c31090f upstream.
SI hardware doesn't support pasids, user mode queues, or KIQ/MES so there is no need for this. Doing so results in a segfault as these callbacks are non-existent for SI.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4744 Fixes: f3854e04b708 ("drm/amdgpu: attach tlb fence to the PTs update") Reviewed-by: Timur Kristóf timur.kristof@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
What kernel tree(s) should this go to?
This fixes a regression introduced in at least 6.17.y (6.17.11) and 6.18.y (6.18.1). So it should at least go to those branches.
If any other branches also have gotten commit f3854e04b708 backported then those should get this too.
Regards,
Hans