On 29/07/21 01:07, Zubin Mithra wrote:
From: Maxim Levitsky mlevitsk@redhat.com
commit b97f074583736c42fb36f2da1164e28c73758912 upstream.
A page fault can be queued while vCPU is in real paged mode on AMD, and AMD manual asks the user to always intercept it (otherwise result is undefined). The resulting VM exit, does have an error code.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky mlevitsk@redhat.com Message-Id: 20210225154135.405125-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra zsm@chromium.org
Backport Note:
Syzkaller triggered a WARNING with the following stacktrace: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3594 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:8635 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 3594 Comm: poc Not tainted 5.4.136-00181-g253dccefb5cb #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x97/0xd3 panic+0x198/0x388 ? __warn_printk+0xee/0xee ? printk+0xad/0xde ? rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace+0xf/0xf ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421 __warn+0xd3/0x113 ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421 report_bug+0xbf/0x100 fixup_bug+0x28/0x4b do_error_trap+0xe7/0xf7 ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421 do_invalid_op+0x3a/0x3f ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421 invalid_op+0x23/0x30 RIP: 0010:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x338/0x2421
This commit is present in linux-5.13.y.
Conflict arises as the following commit is is not present in
linux-5.10.y and older.
- b3646477d458 ("KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops overhead")
Tests run: syzkaller reproducer, Chrome OS tryjobs
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 377157656a8b..5d35b9656b67 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -475,8 +475,6 @@ static void kvm_multiple_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, if (!vcpu->arch.exception.pending && !vcpu->arch.exception.injected) { queue:
if (has_error && !is_protmode(vcpu))
if (reinject) { /* * On vmentry, vcpu->arch.exception.pending is onlyhas_error = false;
@@ -7592,6 +7590,13 @@ static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept(vcpu, tpr, max_irr); } +static void kvm_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{
if (vcpu->arch.exception.error_code && !is_protmode(vcpu))
vcpu->arch.exception.error_code = false;
kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception(vcpu);
+}
- static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int r;
@@ -7599,7 +7604,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) /* try to reinject previous events if any */ if (vcpu->arch.exception.injected)
kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception(vcpu);
/*kvm_inject_exception(vcpu);
- Do not inject an NMI or interrupt if there is a pending
- exception. Exceptions and interrupts are recognized at
@@ -7665,7 +7670,7 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } }
kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception(vcpu);
}kvm_inject_exception(vcpu);
/* Don't consider new event if we re-injected an event */
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com