On 03/11/2019 06:20 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
When we get an interrupt for a channel program, it is not necessarily the final interrupt; for example, the issuing guest may request an intermediate interrupt by specifying the program-controlled-interrupt flag on a ccw.
We must not switch the state to idle if the interrupt is not yet final; even more importantly, we must not free the translated channel program if the interrupt is not yet final, or the host can crash during cp rewind.
Fixes: e5f84dbaea59 ("vfio: ccw: return I/O results asynchronously") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.12+ Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck cohuck@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman farman@linux.ibm.com
Previously part of "vfio-ccw: rework ssch state handling". Please review, I plan to send a pull req asap.
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c index a10cec0e86eb..0b3b9de45c60 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c @@ -72,20 +72,24 @@ static void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work) { struct vfio_ccw_private *private; struct irb *irb;
- bool is_final;
private = container_of(work, struct vfio_ccw_private, io_work); irb = &private->irb;
- is_final = !(scsw_actl(&irb->scsw) &
if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) { cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);(SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
cp_free(&private->cp);
if (is_final)
} memcpy(private->io_region->irb_area, irb, sizeof(*irb));cp_free(&private->cp);
if (private->io_trigger) eventfd_signal(private->io_trigger, 1);
- if (private->mdev)
- if (private->mdev && is_final) private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE; }