Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 15:06, Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 10:23:12AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
From the view point of ZeroCopy using DMABUF, is 5.4 not mature enough, and is 5.10 enough mature ? This is the most important point for judging migration.
How do you judge "mature"?
And again, if a feature isn't present in a specific kernel version, why would you think that it would be a viable solution for you to use?
I'm pretty sure dma_get_sgtable has been around much longer and was supposed to work, but only really did work properly for arm32, and for platforms with coherent DMA. I bet he is using non-coherent arm64,
It's an arm64 platform using coherent DMA where device coherent DMA memory pool is defined in the DT as follows:
reserved-memory { #address-cells = <2>; #size-cells = <2>; ranges;
<snip> encbuffer: encbuffer@0xb0000000 { compatible = "shared-dma-pool"; reg = <0 0xb0000000 0 0x08000000>; // this area used with dma-coherent no-map; }; <snip> };
Device is dma-coherent as per following DT property:
codec { compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pxs3-codec"; <snip> memory-region = <&encbuffer>; dma-coherent; <snip> };
And call chain to create device coherent DMA pool is as follows:
rmem_dma_device_init(); dma_init_coherent_memory(); memremap(); ioremap_wc();
which simply maps coherent DMA memory into vmalloc space on arm64.
The thing I am unclear is why this is called a new feature rather than a bug in dma_common_get_sgtable() which is failing to handle vmalloc addresses? While at the same time DMA debug APIs specifically handle vmalloc addresses [1].
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/kernel...
-Sumit
and it would be broken for other drivers there as well if people did test them, which they apparently so far did not.