On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:18:21PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
Supposing the following scenario with a virtio_blk driver.
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
blk_mq_try_issue_directly() __blk_mq_issue_directly() q->mq_ops->queue_rq() virtio_queue_rq() blk_mq_stop_hw_queue() virtblk_done() blk_mq_try_issue_directly() if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped()) blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_run_hw_queue() blk_mq_insert_request() return
After CPU0 has marked the queue as stopped, CPU1 will see the queue is stopped. But before CPU1 puts the request on the dispatch list, CPU2 receives the interrupt of completion of request, so it will run the hardware queue and marks the queue as non-stopped. Meanwhile, CPU1 also runs the same hardware queue. After both CPU1 and CPU2 complete blk_mq_run_hw_queue(), CPU1 just puts the request to the same hardware queue and returns. It misses dispatching a request. Fix it by running the hardware queue explicitly. And blk_mq_request_issue_directly() should handle a similar situation. Fix it as well.
Fixes: d964f04a8fde ("blk-mq: fix direct issue") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Muchun Song muchun.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Muchun Song songmuchun@bytedance.com Reviewed-by: Ming Lei ming.lei@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014092934.53630-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk (cherry picked from commit 2003ee8a9aa14d766b06088156978d53c2e9be3d)
This was NOT a clean cherry-pick, always document what you had to do differently from the original change please.
Please fix this up and resend a new version.
thanks,
greg k-h