6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Miaohe Lin linmiaohe@huawei.com
commit fe6f86f4b40855a130a19aa589f9ba7f650423f4 upstream.
When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1135! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 PID: 137 Comm: kswapd1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-00491-gd5ce28f156fe-dirty #14 RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0 RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0 RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492 R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> do_shrink_slab+0x14f/0x6a0 shrink_slab+0xca/0x8c0 shrink_node+0x2d0/0x7d0 balance_pgdat+0x33a/0x720 kswapd+0x1f3/0x410 kthread+0xd5/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: mce_inject hwpoison_inject ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0 RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0 RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492 R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
The root cause is that HWPoison flag will be set for huge_zero_folio without increasing the folio refcnt. But then unpoison_memory() will decrease the folio refcnt unexpectedly as it appears like a successfully hwpoisoned folio leading to VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0) when releasing huge_zero_folio.
Skip unpoisoning huge_zero_folio in unpoison_memory() to fix this issue. We're not prepared to unpoison huge_zero_folio yet.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240516122608.22610-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin linmiaohe@huawei.com Acked-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Yang Shi shy828301@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador osalvador@suse.de Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual anshuman.khandual@arm.com Cc: Naoya Horiguchi nao.horiguchi@gmail.com Cc: Xu Yu xuyu@linux.alibaba.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/memory-failure.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -2535,6 +2535,13 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn) goto unlock_mutex; }
+ if (is_huge_zero_page(&folio->page)) { + unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: huge zero page is not supported %#lx\n", + pfn, &unpoison_rs); + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; + goto unlock_mutex; + } + if (!PageHWPoison(p)) { unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Page was already unpoisoned %#lx\n", pfn, &unpoison_rs);