5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
commit 10fad4012234a7dea621ae17c0c9486824f645a0 upstream.
It is reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information") led to a performance regression on Intel Jasper Lake systems because it reduced the time spent by CPUs in idle state C7 which is correlated to the maximum frequency the CPUs can get to because of an average running power limit [1].
Before that commit, get_typical_interval() would have returned UINT_MAX whenever it had been unable to make a high-confidence prediction which had led to selecting the deepest available idle state too often and both power and performance had been inadequate as a result of that on some systems. However, this had not been a problem on systems with relatively aggressive average running power limits, like the Jasper Lake systems in question, because on those systems it was compensated by the ability to run CPUs faster.
It was addressed by causing get_typical_interval() to return a number based on the recent idle duration information available to it even if it could not make a high-confidence prediction, but that clearly did not take the possible correlation between idle power and available CPU capacity into account.
For this reason, revert most of the changes made by commit 85975daeaa4d, except for one cosmetic cleanup, and add a comment explaining the rationale for returning UINT_MAX from get_typical_interval() when it is unable to make a high-confidence prediction.
Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/36iykr223vmcfsoysexug6s274nq2oimcu55ybn6ww4... [1] Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky senozhatsky@chromium.org Cc: All applicable stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3663603.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c @@ -256,20 +256,17 @@ again: * * This can deal with workloads that have long pauses interspersed * with sporadic activity with a bunch of short pauses. + * + * However, if the number of remaining samples is too small to exclude + * any more outliers, allow the deepest available idle state to be + * selected because there are systems where the time spent by CPUs in + * deep idle states is correlated to the maximum frequency the CPUs + * can get to. On those systems, shallow idle states should be avoided + * unless there is a clear indication that the given CPU is most likley + * going to be woken up shortly. */ - if (divisor * 4 <= INTERVALS * 3) { - /* - * If there are sufficiently many data points still under - * consideration after the outliers have been eliminated, - * returning without a prediction would be a mistake because it - * is likely that the next interval will not exceed the current - * maximum, so return the latter in that case. - */ - if (divisor >= INTERVALS / 2) - return max; - + if (divisor * 4 <= INTERVALS * 3) return UINT_MAX; - }
thresh = max - 1; goto again;