6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Joel Fernandes (Google) joel@joelfernandes.org
commit c245910049d04fbfa85bb2f5acd591c24e9907c7 upstream.
Paths using put_prev_task_balance() need to do a pick shortly after. Make sure they also clear the ->dl_server on prev as a part of that.
Fixes: 63ba8422f876 ("sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers") Signed-off-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" joel@joelfernandes.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira bristot@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Juri Lelli juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d184d554434bedbad0581cb34656582d78655150.171681104... Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6005,6 +6005,14 @@ static void put_prev_task_balance(struct #endif
put_prev_task(rq, prev); + + /* + * We've updated @prev and no longer need the server link, clear it. + * Must be done before ->pick_next_task() because that can (re)set + * ->dl_server. + */ + if (prev->dl_server) + prev->dl_server = NULL; }
/* @@ -6048,14 +6056,6 @@ __pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct t restart: put_prev_task_balance(rq, prev, rf);
- /* - * We've updated @prev and no longer need the server link, clear it. - * Must be done before ->pick_next_task() because that can (re)set - * ->dl_server. - */ - if (prev->dl_server) - prev->dl_server = NULL; - for_each_class(class) { p = class->pick_next_task(rq); if (p)