5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yanfei Xu yanfei.xu@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 8a3b8e63f8371c1247b7aa24ff9c5312f1a6948b ]
Even the PCI devices don't support pasid capability, PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. However flushing cache of pasid directory table for these devices are not taken after pasid table is allocated as the "size" of table is zero. Fix it by calculating the size by page order.
Found this when reading the code, no real problem encountered for now.
Fixes: 194b3348bdbb ("iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID directory pointer coherency") Suggested-by: Lu Baolu baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu yanfei.xu@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230616081045.721873-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel jroedel@suse.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c index 80d6412e2c546..9b24e8224379e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int intel_pasid_alloc_table(struct device *dev) device_attach_pasid_table(info, pasid_table);
if (!ecap_coherent(info->iommu->ecap)) - clflush_cache_range(pasid_table->table, size); + clflush_cache_range(pasid_table->table, (1 << order) * PAGE_SIZE);
return 0; }