On 2/28/19 8:11 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Secondly, 4fb8e5b89bcbbb ("include/linux/nodemask.h: use nr_node_ids (not MAX_NUMNODES) in __nodemask_pr_numnodes()") introduced a
There's no such commit, that sha was probably from linux-next. The patch is still in mmotm [1]. Luckily, I would say. Maybe Linus or some automation could run some script to check for bogus Fixes tags before accepting patches?
Ah, that's a relief.
How about we just drop "include/linux/nodemask.h: use nr_node_ids (not MAX_NUMNODES) in __nodemask_pr_numnodes()" (https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/include-linux-nodemaskh-use-nr_nod... It's just a cosmetic thing, really.
Yeah the risk of breaking something is not worth it, IMHO.