From: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com
commit 5e27f38f1f3f45a0c938299c3a34a2d2db77165a upstream.
If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations, e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up included in the instance's cra_name. This is incorrect because it then prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected. Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way.
Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names. This matches what other templates do.
Fixes: 71ebc4d1b27d ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+ Cc: Martin Willi martin@strongswan.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com Reviewed-by: Martin Willi martin@strongswan.org Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- crypto/chacha20poly1305.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c +++ b/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c @@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct cryp
err = -ENAMETOOLONG; if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, - "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha_name, - poly_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME) + "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_name, + poly->cra_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME) goto out_drop_chacha; if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->base.cra_driver_name,