6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yazhou Tang tangyazhou518@outlook.com
[ Upstream commit 55c0ced59fe17dee34e9dfd5f7be63cbab207758 ]
When verifying BPF programs, the check_alu_op() function validates instructions with ALU operations. The 'offset' field in these instructions is a signed 16-bit integer.
The existing check 'insn->off > 1' was intended to ensure the offset is either 0, or 1 for BPF_MOD/BPF_DIV. However, because 'insn->off' is signed, this check incorrectly accepts all negative values (e.g., -1).
This commit tightens the validation by changing the condition to '(insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1)'. This ensures that any value other than the explicitly permitted 0 and 1 is rejected, hardening the verifier against malformed BPF programs.
Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan shenghaoyuan0928@163.com Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan shenghaoyuan0928@163.com Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao ziye@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao ziye@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang tangyazhou518@outlook.com Acked-by: Yonghong Song yonghong.song@linux.dev Fixes: ec0e2da95f72 ("bpf: Support new signed div/mod instructions.") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_70D024BAE70A0A309A4781694C7B764B0608@qq.co... Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index a6f825b7fbe6c..5e644b1b12aaa 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -13727,7 +13727,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } else { /* all other ALU ops: and, sub, xor, add, ... */
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { - if (insn->imm != 0 || insn->off > 1 || + if (insn->imm != 0 || (insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1) || (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) { verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -13737,7 +13737,7 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) if (err) return err; } else { - if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off > 1 || + if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || (insn->off != 0 && insn->off != 1) || (insn->off == 1 && opcode != BPF_MOD && opcode != BPF_DIV)) { verbose(env, "BPF_ALU uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL;