On 5/6/25 23:59, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
Hi,
On 5/6/2025 5:41 PM, Lizhi Hou wrote:
On 5/6/25 02:20, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:
Use FW names from linux-firmware repo instead of deprecated ones.
Fixes: c140244f0cfb ("accel/ivpu: Add initial Panther Lake support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+ Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c index ccaaf6c100c02..9db741695401e 100644 --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c @@ -55,18 +55,18 @@ static struct { int gen; const char *name; } fw_names[] = { - { IVPU_HW_IP_37XX, "vpu_37xx.bin" }, + { IVPU_HW_IP_37XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_37xx_v1.bin" },
What if old only vpu_37xx.bin is installed but not intel/vpu/vpu_37xx_v1?
Maybe just put *_v1 line in front without removing { ..., "vpu_37xx.bin"} ?
The vpu_37xx.bin style names were never released. This was only for developer convenience but it turns out that developers don't use this anymore, so it is safe to remove. Maybe it make sense to mention this in commit message :)
Sounds great.
Reviewed-by: Lizhi Hou lizhi.hou@amd.com
{ IVPU_HW_IP_37XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_37xx_v0.0.bin" }, - { IVPU_HW_IP_40XX, "vpu_40xx.bin" }, + { IVPU_HW_IP_40XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_40xx_v1.bin" }, { IVPU_HW_IP_40XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_40xx_v0.0.bin" }, - { IVPU_HW_IP_50XX, "vpu_50xx.bin" }, + { IVPU_HW_IP_50XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_50xx_v1.bin" }, { IVPU_HW_IP_50XX, "intel/vpu/vpu_50xx_v0.0.bin" }, }; /* Production fw_names from the table above */ -MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_37xx_v0.0.bin"); -MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_40xx_v0.0.bin"); -MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_50xx_v0.0.bin"); +MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_37xx_v1.bin"); +MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_40xx_v1.bin"); +MODULE_FIRMWARE("intel/vpu/vpu_50xx_v1.bin"); static int ivpu_fw_request(struct ivpu_device *vdev) {