From: Rahul Lakkireddy rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com
[ Upstream commit a27fb314cba8cb84cd6456a4699c3330a83c326d ]
commit db43b30cd89c ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion") has moved searching for next highest priority HASH filter rule to cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(), which searches the rhashtable before the the rule is removed from it and hence always finds at least 1 entry. Fix by removing the rule from rhashtable first before calling cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy() and hence avoid fetching stale info.
Fixes: db43b30cd89c ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion") Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c index 1b88bd1c2dbe..dd9be229819a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_tc_flower.c @@ -997,20 +997,16 @@ int cxgb4_tc_flower_destroy(struct net_device *dev, if (!ch_flower) return -ENOENT;
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node, + adap->flower_ht_params); + ret = cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(dev, ch_flower->fs.tc_prio, &ch_flower->fs, ch_flower->filter_id); if (ret) - goto err; + netdev_err(dev, "Flow rule destroy failed for tid: %u, ret: %d", + ch_flower->filter_id, ret);
- ret = rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node, - adap->flower_ht_params); - if (ret) { - netdev_err(dev, "Flow remove from rhashtable failed"); - goto err; - } kfree_rcu(ch_flower, rcu); - -err: return ret; }