5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikita Zhandarovich n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru
[ Upstream commit 39c960bbf9d9ea862398759e75736cfb68c3446f ]
While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted left.
Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: 1729dd33d20b ("drm/radeon/kms: r600 CS parser fixes") Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c index 8be4799a98ef..6ade5dd470d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static int r600_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx) return -EINVAL; } tmp = (reg - CB_COLOR0_BASE) / 4; - track->cb_color_bo_offset[tmp] = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8; + track->cb_color_bo_offset[tmp] = (u64)radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8; ib[idx] += (u32)((reloc->gpu_offset >> 8) & 0xffffffff); track->cb_color_base_last[tmp] = ib[idx]; track->cb_color_bo[tmp] = reloc->robj; @@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ static int r600_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx) "0x%04X\n", reg); return -EINVAL; } - track->htile_offset = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8; + track->htile_offset = (u64)radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8; ib[idx] += (u32)((reloc->gpu_offset >> 8) & 0xffffffff); track->htile_bo = reloc->robj; track->db_dirty = true;