6.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Lechner dlechner@baylibre.com
commit 399b883ec828e436f1a721bf8551b4da8727e65b upstream.
Fix a potential out-of-bounds array access of the hw_xlate array in bno055.c.
In bno055_get_regmask(), hw_xlate was iterated over the length of the vals array instead of the length of the hw_xlate array. In the case of bno055_gyr_scale, the vals array is larger than the hw_xlate array, so this could result in an out-of-bounds access. In practice, this shouldn't happen though because a match should always be found which breaks out of the for loop before it iterates beyond the end of the hw_xlate array.
By adding a new hw_xlate_len field to the bno055_sysfs_attr, we can be sure we are iterating over the correct length.
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507100510.rGt1YOOx-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 4aefe1c2bd0c ("iio: imu: add Bosch Sensortec BNO055 core driver") Signed-off-by: David Lechner dlechner@baylibre.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709-iio-const-data-19-v2-1-fb3fc9191251@baylib... Cc: Stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bno055/bno055.c @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct bno055_sysfs_attr { int len; int *fusion_vals; int *hw_xlate; + int hw_xlate_len; int type; };
@@ -170,20 +171,24 @@ static int bno055_gyr_scale_vals[] = { 1000, 1877467, 2000, 1877467, };
+static int bno055_gyr_scale_hw_xlate[] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}; static struct bno055_sysfs_attr bno055_gyr_scale = { .vals = bno055_gyr_scale_vals, .len = ARRAY_SIZE(bno055_gyr_scale_vals), .fusion_vals = (int[]){1, 900}, - .hw_xlate = (int[]){4, 3, 2, 1, 0}, + .hw_xlate = bno055_gyr_scale_hw_xlate, + .hw_xlate_len = ARRAY_SIZE(bno055_gyr_scale_hw_xlate), .type = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, };
static int bno055_gyr_lpf_vals[] = {12, 23, 32, 47, 64, 116, 230, 523}; +static int bno055_gyr_lpf_hw_xlate[] = {5, 4, 7, 3, 6, 2, 1, 0}; static struct bno055_sysfs_attr bno055_gyr_lpf = { .vals = bno055_gyr_lpf_vals, .len = ARRAY_SIZE(bno055_gyr_lpf_vals), .fusion_vals = (int[]){32}, - .hw_xlate = (int[]){5, 4, 7, 3, 6, 2, 1, 0}, + .hw_xlate = bno055_gyr_lpf_hw_xlate, + .hw_xlate_len = ARRAY_SIZE(bno055_gyr_lpf_hw_xlate), .type = IIO_VAL_INT, };
@@ -561,7 +566,7 @@ static int bno055_get_regmask(struct bno
idx = (hwval & mask) >> shift; if (attr->hw_xlate) - for (i = 0; i < attr->len; i++) + for (i = 0; i < attr->hw_xlate_len; i++) if (attr->hw_xlate[i] == idx) { idx = i; break;