[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: f710202b2a45addea3dcdcd862770ecbaf6597ef
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: sergio.collado@gmail.com Commit author: Nathan Chancellornathan@kernel.org
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: ebd352672790) 6.6.y | Not found
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: f710202b2a45a ! 1: 29c4ece87594a x86/tools: Drop duplicate unlikely() definition in insn_decoder_test.c @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## x86/tools: Drop duplicate unlikely() definition in insn_decoder_test.c
+ commit f710202b2a45addea3dcdcd862770ecbaf6597ef upstream. + After commit c104c16073b7 ("Kunit to check the longest symbol length"), there is a warning when building with clang because there is now a definition of unlikely from compiler.h in tools/include/linux, which @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Acked-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org + Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318-x86-decoder-test-fix-unlikely-redef-v1-1-...
## arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c ## ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.6.y | Success | Success |