5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com
[ Upstream commit 035bca3f017ee9dea3a5a756e77a6f7138cc6eea ]
syzbot reported use-after-free in mptcp_schedule_work() [1]
Issue here is that mptcp_schedule_work() schedules a work, then gets a refcount on sk->sk_refcnt if the work was scheduled. This refcount will be released by mptcp_worker().
[A] if (schedule_work(...)) { [B] sock_hold(sk); return true; }
Problem is that mptcp_worker() can run immediately and complete before [B]
We need instead :
sock_hold(sk); if (schedule_work(...)) return true; sock_put(sk);
[1] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 29 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xfa/0x1d0 lib/refcount.c:25 Call Trace: <TASK> __refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:-1 [inline] __refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:366 [inline] refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:383 [inline] sock_hold include/net/sock.h:816 [inline] mptcp_schedule_work+0x164/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:943 mptcp_tout_timer+0x21/0xa0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2316 call_timer_fn+0x17e/0x5f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1747 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1798 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2372 [inline] __run_timer_base+0x648/0x970 kernel/time/timer.c:2384 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2393 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x180 kernel/time/timer.c:2403 handle_softirqs+0x22f/0x710 kernel/softirq.c:622 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline] run_ktimerd+0xcf/0x190 kernel/softirq.c:1138 smpboot_thread_fn+0x542/0xa60 kernel/smpboot.c:160 kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 3b1d6210a957 ("mptcp: implement and use MPTCP-level retransmission") Reported-by: syzbot+355158e7e301548a1424@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/6915b46f.050a0220.3565dc.0028.GAE@google.com/... Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113103924.3737425-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -716,14 +716,19 @@ static void mptcp_reset_timer(struct soc
bool mptcp_schedule_work(struct sock *sk) { - if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) != TCP_CLOSE && - schedule_work(&mptcp_sk(sk)->work)) { - /* each subflow already holds a reference to the sk, and the - * workqueue is invoked by a subflow, so sk can't go away here. - */ - sock_hold(sk); + if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_CLOSE) + return false; + + /* Get a reference on this socket, mptcp_worker() will release it. + * As mptcp_worker() might complete before us, we can not avoid + * a sock_hold()/sock_put() if schedule_work() returns false. + */ + sock_hold(sk); + + if (schedule_work(&mptcp_sk(sk)->work)) return true; - } + + sock_put(sk); return false; }