From: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com
commit 0f2b1cb89ccdbdcedf7143f4153a4da700a05f48 upstream.
While a non-waiting posix lock request (F_SETLK) is waiting for user space processing (in dlm_controld), wait for that processing to complete with an unkillable wait_event(). This makes F_SETLK behave the same way for F_RDLCK, F_WRLCK and F_UNLCK. F_SETLKW continues to use wait_event_killable().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring aahringo@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Teigland teigland@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/dlm/plock.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c @@ -154,25 +154,29 @@ int dlm_posix_lock(dlm_lockspace_t *lock
send_op(op);
- rv = wait_event_killable(recv_wq, (op->done != 0)); - if (rv == -ERESTARTSYS) { - spin_lock(&ops_lock); - /* recheck under ops_lock if we got a done != 0, - * if so this interrupt case should be ignored - */ - if (op->done != 0) { + if (op->info.wait) { + rv = wait_event_killable(recv_wq, (op->done != 0)); + if (rv == -ERESTARTSYS) { + spin_lock(&ops_lock); + /* recheck under ops_lock if we got a done != 0, + * if so this interrupt case should be ignored + */ + if (op->done != 0) { + spin_unlock(&ops_lock); + goto do_lock_wait; + } + list_del(&op->list); spin_unlock(&ops_lock); - goto do_lock_wait; - } - list_del(&op->list); - spin_unlock(&ops_lock);
- log_debug(ls, "%s: wait interrupted %x %llx pid %d", - __func__, ls->ls_global_id, - (unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid); - do_unlock_close(&op->info); - dlm_release_plock_op(op); - goto out; + log_debug(ls, "%s: wait interrupted %x %llx pid %d", + __func__, ls->ls_global_id, + (unsigned long long)number, op->info.pid); + do_unlock_close(&op->info); + dlm_release_plock_op(op); + goto out; + } + } else { + wait_event(recv_wq, (op->done != 0)); }
do_lock_wait: