6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Zi Yan ziy@nvidia.com
commit 40b760cfd44566bca791c80e0720d70d75382b84 upstream.
When handling a numa page fault, task_numa_fault() should be called by a process that restores the page table of the faulted folio to avoid duplicated stats counting. Commit b99a342d4f11 ("NUMA balancing: reduce TLB flush via delaying mapping on hint page fault") restructured do_numa_page() and did not avoid task_numa_fault() call in the second page table check after a numa migration failure. Fix it by making all !pte_same() return immediately.
This issue can cause task_numa_fault() being called more than necessary and lead to unexpected numa balancing results (It is hard to tell whether the issue will cause positive or negative performance impact due to duplicated numa fault counting).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240809145906.1513458-2-ziy@nvidia.com Fixes: b99a342d4f11 ("NUMA balancing: reduce TLB flush via delaying mapping on hint page fault") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan ziy@nvidia.com Reported-by: "Huang, Ying" ying.huang@intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/87zfqfw0yw.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel... Acked-by: David Hildenbrand david@redhat.com Cc: Baolin Wang baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Cc: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: Mel Gorman mgorman@suse.de Cc: Yang Shi shy828301@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/memory.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -5155,7 +5155,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm
if (unlikely(!pte_same(old_pte, vmf->orig_pte))) { pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); - goto out; + return 0; }
pte = pte_modify(old_pte, vma->vm_page_prot); @@ -5218,23 +5218,19 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm if (!migrate_misplaced_folio(folio, vma, target_nid)) { nid = target_nid; flags |= TNF_MIGRATED; - } else { - flags |= TNF_MIGRATE_FAIL; - vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, - vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); - if (unlikely(!vmf->pte)) - goto out; - if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), vmf->orig_pte))) { - pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); - goto out; - } - goto out_map; + task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags); + return 0; }
-out: - if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) - task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags); - return 0; + flags |= TNF_MIGRATE_FAIL; + vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, + vmf->address, &vmf->ptl); + if (unlikely(!vmf->pte)) + return 0; + if (unlikely(!pte_same(ptep_get(vmf->pte), vmf->orig_pte))) { + pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); + return 0; + } out_map: /* * Make it present again, depending on how arch implements @@ -5247,7 +5243,10 @@ out_map: numa_rebuild_single_mapping(vmf, vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte, writable); pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); - goto out; + + if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) + task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, nid, nr_pages, flags); + return 0; }
static inline vm_fault_t create_huge_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf)