The patch titled Subject: nilfs2: initialize unused bytes in segment summary blocks has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is nilfs2-initialize-unused-bytes-in-segment-summary-blocks.patch
This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches...
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------ From: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Subject: nilfs2: initialize unused bytes in segment summary blocks Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 02:35:13 +0900
Syzbot still reports uninit-value in nilfs_add_checksums_on_logs() for KMSAN enabled kernels after applying commit 7397031622e0 ("nilfs2: initialize "struct nilfs_binfo_dat"->bi_pad field").
This is because the unused bytes at the end of each block in segment summaries are not initialized. So this fixes the issue by padding the unused bytes with null bytes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417173513.12598-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+048585f3f4227bb2b49b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=048585f3f4227bb2b49b Cc: Alexander Potapenko glider@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-initialize-unused-bytes-in-segment-summary-blocks +++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -430,6 +430,23 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_reset_segment_b return 0; }
+/** + * nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum - zero pad the rest of the segment summary area + * @sci: segment constructor object + * + * nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum() zero-fills unallocated space at the end of + * the current segment summary block. + */ +static void nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) +{ + struct nilfs_segsum_pointer *ssp; + + ssp = sci->sc_blk_cnt > 0 ? &sci->sc_binfo_ptr : &sci->sc_finfo_ptr; + if (ssp->offset < ssp->bh->b_size) + memset(ssp->bh->b_data + ssp->offset, 0, + ssp->bh->b_size - ssp->offset); +} + static int nilfs_segctor_feed_segment(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci) { sci->sc_nblk_this_inc += sci->sc_curseg->sb_sum.nblocks; @@ -438,6 +455,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_feed_segment(st * The current segment is filled up * (internal code) */ + nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum(sci); sci->sc_curseg = NILFS_NEXT_SEGBUF(sci->sc_curseg); return nilfs_segctor_reset_segment_buffer(sci); } @@ -542,6 +560,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_add_file_block( goto retry; } if (unlikely(required)) { + nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum(sci); err = nilfs_segbuf_extend_segsum(segbuf); if (unlikely(err)) goto failed; @@ -1533,6 +1552,7 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_collect(struct nadd = min_t(int, nadd << 1, SC_MAX_SEGDELTA); sci->sc_stage = prev_stage; } + nilfs_segctor_zeropad_segsum(sci); nilfs_segctor_truncate_segments(sci, sci->sc_curseg, nilfs->ns_sufile); return 0;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are
nilfs2-initialize-unused-bytes-in-segment-summary-blocks.patch