From: David Gow davidgow@google.com
[ Upstream commit 133e267ef4a26d19c93996a874714e9f3f8c70aa ]
'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's __printf attribute.
Fixes: 276010551664 ("time: Improve performance of time64_to_tm()") Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt justinstitt@google.com Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- kernel/time/time_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/time_test.c b/kernel/time/time_test.c index ca058c8af6baf..3e5d422dd15cb 100644 --- a/kernel/time/time_test.c +++ b/kernel/time/time_test.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
- #define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \ + #define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \ year, month, mdday, yday, days
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);