On 2022-09-16 at 17:20:43 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
On 9/16/22 4:52 PM, Russ Weight wrote:
There is an error check following the allocation of flash_buf that returns without freeing flash_buf. It makes more sense to do the error check before the allocation and the reordering eliminates the memory leak.
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com Fixes: 154afa5c31cd ("fpga: m10bmc-sec: expose max10 flash update count") Signed-off-by: Russ Weight russell.h.weight@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com
Acked-by: Xu Yilun yilun.xu@intel.com
Applied to for-6.0
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c index 526c8cdd1474..79d48852825e 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-sec-update.c @@ -148,10 +148,6 @@ static ssize_t flash_count_show(struct device *dev, stride = regmap_get_reg_stride(sec->m10bmc->regmap); num_bits = FLASH_COUNT_SIZE * 8;
- flash_buf = kmalloc(FLASH_COUNT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!flash_buf)
return -ENOMEM;- if (FLASH_COUNT_SIZE % stride) { dev_err(sec->dev, "FLASH_COUNT_SIZE (0x%x) not aligned to stride (0x%x)\n",
@@ -160,6 +156,10 @@ static ssize_t flash_count_show(struct device *dev, return -EINVAL; }
- flash_buf = kmalloc(FLASH_COUNT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!flash_buf)
return -ENOMEM;- ret = regmap_bulk_read(sec->m10bmc->regmap, STAGING_FLASH_COUNT, flash_buf, FLASH_COUNT_SIZE / stride); if (ret) {