The quilt patch titled Subject: writeback: avoid use-after-free after removing device has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was writeback-avoid-use-after-free-after-removing-device.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------ From: Khazhismel Kumykov khazhy@chromium.org Subject: writeback: avoid use-after-free after removing device Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:50:34 -0700
When a disk is removed, bdi_unregister gets called to stop further writeback and wait for associated delayed work to complete. However, wb_inode_writeback_end() may schedule bandwidth estimation dwork after this has completed, which can result in the timer attempting to access the just freed bdi_writeback.
Fix this by checking if the bdi_writeback is alive, similar to when scheduling writeback work.
Since this requires wb->work_lock, and wb_inode_writeback_end() may get called from interrupt, switch wb->work_lock to an irqsafe lock.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220801155034.3772543-1-khazhy@google.com Fixes: 45a2966fd641 ("writeback: fix bandwidth estimate for spiky workload") Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov khazhy@google.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Cc: Michael Stapelberg stapelberg+linux@google.com Cc: Wu Fengguang fengguang.wu@intel.com Cc: Alexander Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 12 ++++++------ mm/backing-dev.c | 10 +++++----- mm/page-writeback.c | 6 +++++- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c~writeback-avoid-use-after-free-after-removing-device +++ a/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(st
static void wb_wakeup(struct bdi_writeback *wb) { - spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock); if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0); - spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock); }
static void finish_writeback_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb, @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_wri if (work->done) atomic_inc(&work->done->cnt);
- spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) { list_add_tail(&work->list, &wb->work_list); @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_wri } else finish_writeback_work(wb, work);
- spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock); }
/** @@ -2082,13 +2082,13 @@ static struct wb_writeback_work *get_nex { struct wb_writeback_work *work = NULL;
- spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock); if (!list_empty(&wb->work_list)) { work = list_entry(wb->work_list.next, struct wb_writeback_work, list); list_del_init(&work->list); } - spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock); return work; }
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c~writeback-avoid-use-after-free-after-removing-device +++ a/mm/backing-dev.c @@ -260,10 +260,10 @@ void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeb unsigned long timeout;
timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10); - spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock); if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, timeout); - spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock); }
static void wb_update_bandwidth_workfn(struct work_struct *work) @@ -334,12 +334,12 @@ static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(st static void wb_shutdown(struct bdi_writeback *wb) { /* Make sure nobody queues further work */ - spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock); if (!test_and_clear_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) { - spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock); return; } - spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(wb); /* --- a/mm/page-writeback.c~writeback-avoid-use-after-free-after-removing-device +++ a/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -2892,6 +2892,7 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_start(str
static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struct bdi_writeback *wb) { + unsigned long flags; atomic_dec(&wb->writeback_inodes); /* * Make sure estimate of writeback throughput gets updated after @@ -2900,7 +2901,10 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struc * that if multiple inodes end writeback at a similar time, they get * batched into one bandwidth update. */ - queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL); + spin_lock_irqsave(&wb->work_lock, flags); + if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) + queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wb->work_lock, flags); }
bool __folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio) _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from khazhy@chromium.org are