6.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
commit 0c0b4a49d3e7f49690a6827a41faeffad5df7e21 upstream.
Syzbot reports a warning as follows:
============================================ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5075 at fs/mbcache.c:419 mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 5075 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-gb947cc5bf6d7 RIP: 0010:mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290 fs/mbcache.c:419 Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_put_super+0x6d4/0xcd0 fs/ext4/super.c:1375 generic_shutdown_super+0x136/0x2d0 fs/super.c:641 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1675 ext4_kill_sb+0x68/0xa0 fs/ext4/super.c:7327 [...] ============================================
This is because when finding an entry in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(), if ext4_sb_bread() returns -ENOMEM, the ce's e_refcnt, which has already grown in the __entry_find(), won't be put away, and eventually trigger the above issue in mb_cache_destroy() due to reference count leakage.
So call mb_cache_entry_put() on the -ENOMEM error branch as a quick fix.
Reported-by: syzbot+dd43bd0f7474512edc47@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dd43bd0f7474512edc47 Fixes: fb265c9cb49e ("ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases") Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240504075526.2254349-2-libaokun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -3113,8 +3113,10 @@ ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(struct inode
bh = ext4_sb_bread(inode->i_sb, ce->e_value, REQ_PRIO); if (IS_ERR(bh)) { - if (PTR_ERR(bh) == -ENOMEM) + if (PTR_ERR(bh) == -ENOMEM) { + mb_cache_entry_put(ea_block_cache, ce); return NULL; + } bh = NULL; EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "block %lu read error", (unsigned long)ce->e_value);