4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kumar Sanghvi kumaras@chelsio.com
[ Upstream commit 849a742c59a3d597473c0232f9c2506c69eeef14 ]
Earlier code of doing bitwise AND with field width bits was wrong. Instead, simplify code to calculate ntuple_mask based on supplied fields and then compare with mask configured in hw - which is the correct and simpler way to validate ntuple mask.
Fixes: 3eb8b62d5a26 ("cxgb4: add support to create hash-filters via tc-flower offload") Signed-off-by: Kumar Sanghvi kumaras@chelsio.com Signed-off-by: Ganesh Goudar ganeshgr@chelsio.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c | 88 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_filter.c @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ bool is_filter_exact_match(struct adapte { struct tp_params *tp = &adap->params.tp; u64 hash_filter_mask = tp->hash_filter_mask; - u32 mask; + u64 ntuple_mask = 0;
if (!is_hashfilter(adap)) return false; @@ -865,73 +865,45 @@ bool is_filter_exact_match(struct adapte if (!fs->val.fport || fs->mask.fport != 0xffff) return false;
- if (tp->fcoe_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->fcoe_shift) & FT_FCOE_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.fcoe) - return false; - } + /* calculate tuple mask and compare with mask configured in hw */ + if (tp->fcoe_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.fcoe << tp->fcoe_shift;
- if (tp->port_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->port_shift) & FT_PORT_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.iport) - return false; - } + if (tp->port_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.iport << tp->port_shift;
if (tp->vnic_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->vnic_shift) & FT_VNIC_ID_W; - - if ((adap->params.tp.ingress_config & VNIC_F)) { - if (mask && !fs->mask.pfvf_vld) - return false; - } else { - if (mask && !fs->mask.ovlan_vld) - return false; - } + if ((adap->params.tp.ingress_config & VNIC_F)) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.pfvf_vld << tp->vnic_shift; + else + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ovlan_vld << + tp->vnic_shift; }
- if (tp->vlan_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->vlan_shift) & FT_VLAN_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.ivlan) - return false; - } + if (tp->vlan_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ivlan << tp->vlan_shift;
- if (tp->tos_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->tos_shift) & FT_TOS_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.tos) - return false; - } + if (tp->tos_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.tos << tp->tos_shift;
- if (tp->protocol_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->protocol_shift) & FT_PROTOCOL_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.proto) - return false; - } + if (tp->protocol_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.proto << tp->protocol_shift;
- if (tp->ethertype_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->ethertype_shift) & - FT_ETHERTYPE_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.ethtype) - return false; - } + if (tp->ethertype_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.ethtype << tp->ethertype_shift;
- if (tp->macmatch_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->macmatch_shift) & FT_MACMATCH_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.macidx) - return false; - } + if (tp->macmatch_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.macidx << tp->macmatch_shift; + + if (tp->matchtype_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.matchtype << tp->matchtype_shift; + + if (tp->frag_shift >= 0) + ntuple_mask |= (u64)fs->mask.frag << tp->frag_shift; + + if (ntuple_mask != hash_filter_mask) + return false;
- if (tp->matchtype_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->matchtype_shift) & - FT_MPSHITTYPE_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.matchtype) - return false; - } - if (tp->frag_shift >= 0) { - mask = (hash_filter_mask >> tp->frag_shift) & - FT_FRAGMENTATION_W; - if (mask && !fs->mask.frag) - return false; - } return true; }