From: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com
[ Upstream commit 04587ad9bef6ce9d510325b4ba9852b6129eebdb ]
If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the transaction, because we could leave an inode with the improper counts or some other such corruption behind.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik josef@toxicpanda.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c index 3af06ef98b12..04422d929c23 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c @@ -1073,6 +1073,14 @@ static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(fs_info, node, (ret < 0)); btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node);
+ /* + * If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the + * transaction, because we could leave the inode with the improper + * counts behind. + */ + if (ret && ret != -ENOENT) + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret); + return ret;
search: