[ Upstream commit d7ee81ad09f072eab1681877fc71ec05f9c1ae92 ]
This is similar to commit 674d9de02aa7 ("NFC: Fix possible memory corruption when handling SHDLC I-Frame commands").
I'm not totally sure, but I think that commit description may have overstated the danger. I was under the impression that this data came from the firmware? If you can't trust your networking firmware, then you're already in trouble.
Anyway, these days we add bounds checking where ever we can and we call it kernel hardening. Better safe than sorry.
Fixes: 11f54f228643 ("NFC: nci: Add HCI over NCI protocol support") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com --- net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c index ddfc52ac1f9b4..c0d323b58e732 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c @@ -312,6 +312,10 @@ static void nci_hci_cmd_received(struct nci_dev *ndev, u8 pipe, create_info = (struct nci_hci_create_pipe_resp *)skb->data; dest_gate = create_info->dest_gate; new_pipe = create_info->pipe; + if (new_pipe >= NCI_HCI_MAX_PIPES) { + status = NCI_HCI_ANY_E_NOK; + goto exit; + }
/* Save the new created pipe and bind with local gate, * the description for skb->data[3] is destination gate id @@ -336,6 +340,10 @@ static void nci_hci_cmd_received(struct nci_dev *ndev, u8 pipe, goto exit; } delete_info = (struct nci_hci_delete_pipe_noti *)skb->data; + if (delete_info->pipe >= NCI_HCI_MAX_PIPES) { + status = NCI_HCI_ANY_E_NOK; + goto exit; + }
ndev->hci_dev->pipes[delete_info->pipe].gate = NCI_HCI_INVALID_GATE;